Dr Michael Davies and Dr PJB Scott
15th January, 2021

Dr PJB Scott, BA, BSc, PhD., trained in biology and oceanography in Canada. Dr Scott has, for many years, studied the effects of organisms, particularly micro-organisms, on structures in underwater and wet environments and has extensive industrial experience in identification and remediation techniques of microbial attack of materials.

Eur Ing, Dr Michael Davies PhD, MSc, MIMMM, CEng, PEng (Ont) originally trained as a metallurgist and has specialised in materials engineering, corrosion, failure analysis and inspection. He has had extensive experience in these fields in chemical process, oil and gas, marine, power and pulp and paper. He has been a member of the KJA team since 2012.

** An updated article with newer finding, especially in relation to the Omicron variant, can be found here: https://www.kja.com/2022/01/05/update-to-elevators-and-covid-transmission-a-scientific-review/
This existing post remains available for reference, but updated guidance is provided in the latest posting.


There are a lot of claims that elevators are a source of spreading coronavirus.  There are only a small number of convincing cases where the use of elevators was involved in spread of the virus from one person to another. These instances are rare because exposure times are short and elevators are generally safe from infection transmission. 

It is, however, understandable that people are nervous about entering an enclosed space with strangers and there are some simple, practical steps that can be taken to alleviate these concerns.

Covid-19 can be transmitted through direct contact of contaminated surfaces or from airborne droplets.  Recent research has concluded that airborne droplets and tiny aerosols are the major source of transmission but both of these can be significantly reduced by changes in behaviour when using elevators. 

Immediately available and relatively cost-effective solutions include:

  • Keeping elevator doors open while idle and for longer when in use (where possible under local codes),
  • Leaving ventilation systems on during idle operation,
  • Decreasing elevator capacity by encouraging stair use,
  • Reducing permitted elevator loading,
  • Distanced queuing and floor markings,
  • Staggered arrival, departure and lunch times,
  • Wearing masks and avoiding talking,
  • The use of objects (pen, tissues, sanitary wipes, etc) to avoid touching elevator buttons, provision and use of hand sanitizers.

Addition of air circulation or purification systems, such as UV, ionizing treatments, installation of HEPA filters or changes in direction of air flow in the cabin have been suggested as possible solutions. These are all expensive refits and can cause maintenance and on-going cost issues and are probably unnecessary, especially if the simple measures listed above are adopted.

Retrofitting of contactless buttons can be done in a reasonable time frame but is costly and may be unnecessary since contact transmission is uncommon.  Changing the materials of elevator walls, buttons and other surfaces is really only practical when designing new buildings and it is almost certainly an unnecessary expense.


Elevators are closed spaces that can become crowded.  The time spent in them on any given journey is, however, short.  What are the risks of picking up COVID-19 or other viruses or bacteria and what methods can be used to reduce the risk of infection?

How COVID-19 is transmitted

Respiratory viruses, including SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19), are transmitted in two main ways. [1][2]  These need to be considered individually.

  1. Contact transmission, where someone comes into direct contact with an infected person or touches a surface that has been contaminated.
  2. Contactless transmission through the air.  This method, in turn, is divided into two types, depending on the size of contaminated droplets and how long they stay airborne.
    • droplet transmission of both large and small respiratory droplets that contain the virus, which would occur when near an infected person. Facemasks and shields offer protection from larger droplets.
    • airborne transmission of smaller droplets and particles (aerosols) that are suspended in the air over longer distances and time than droplet transmission. Respiratory aerosols are expelled from the infected person through breathing, coughing, sneezing, singing, talking, etc and can reach the eyes, nose, mouth of any people nearby.  Effectiveness of facemasks and shields against airborne transmission is less certain.

Contact transmission

Contact transmission occurs if contaminated droplets land on surfaces which are then contacted by other people.  Viable COVID-19 virus has been shown to remain viable on contaminated surfaces (fomites) for hours or even days.  Their time of remaining infectious depends on temperature, humidity and the composition and nature of the surface.   

The latest research suggests that direct contact is unlikely to be a major route of transmission.  Although SARS-CoV-2 can persist for days on inanimate surfaces, attempts to culture the virus from these surfaces have been unsuccessful.[3]

A review of literature on contact transmission showed that most studies have been done under experimental conditions.[4] For example, in the studies that used a sample of 10⁷, 10⁶, and 10⁴ particles of infectious virus on a small surface area, these concentrations are a lot higher than those in droplets in real-life situations, with the amount of virus actually deposited on surfaces likely to be several orders of magnitude smaller.  A representation of a real-life situation found no viable virus on fomites.  The chance of transmission through inanimate surfaces is very small, and only in instances where an infected person coughs or sneezes on the surface, and someone else touches that surface soon after the cough or sneeze (within 1–2 hours). Although periodically disinfecting surfaces and use of gloves are reasonable precautions, especially in hospitals, fomites that have not been in contact with an infected carrier for many hours do not pose a measurable risk of transmission in non-hospital settings. A more balanced perspective is needed to curb excesses that become counterproductive.

Non-contact transmission

Viruses in droplets (larger than 100 µm) can be sprayed like tiny cannonballs onto nearby individuals but because of their limited travel range, physical distancing reduces exposure to these droplets.[5] Aerosols (smaller than 100 µm) are generated during normal talking and breathing.

In a laser study, large droplets were observed to fall onto the ground rapidly. [6] Although the speed of the drops ranged 2–7 m/s at the start of the cough, the visible large drops (typically 500 μm in diameter) do not travel far before their trajectory bends down due to gravity to rapidly fall onto the ground within 1 second. From a sneeze, very large drops, originating from both the buccal and nasal cavities, were n ot persistent. Droplets coming from the nasal cavity with normal breathing were not detected above the background noise level.

Small droplets of typical radius of 5 µm have been calculated to take 9 minutes to reach the ground when produced at a height of 160 cm (i.e., average speaking or coughing height) in unventilated settings.

Time to settling is heavily dependent on ventilation. In one study, in the best ventilated room (with open door and window), the number of droplets had halved after 30 seconds. In a poorly ventilated room the half-life was 1.4 minutes. With no ventilation aerosols took about 5 minutes to settle. [6]

Initially it was thought that airborne aerosol transmission of COVID-19 was unlikely, but growing evidence has highlighted that infective microdroplets are small enough to remain suspended in the air and expose individuals at distances beyond 2 m from an infected person.

Airborne transmission has been shown to occur during medical procedures that generate aerosols.[1]   WHO and scientists have been evaluating whether COVID-19 may also spread through aerosols in the absence of medical aerosol generating procedures, particularly in indoor settings with poor ventilation. They concluded that aerosol transmission, combined with droplet transmission, for example, during choir practice, in restaurants or in fitness classes is possible.  In these events, short-range aerosol transmission, particularly in specific indoor locations, such as crowded and inadequately ventilated spaces over a prolonged period of time with infected persons cannot be ruled out. This is also corroborated by investigation of the spread of cases between people who were not in direct or indirect contact, suggesting that aerosol transmission was the most likely route.[1]

Viruses in aerosols can remain suspended in the air for many seconds to hours, like smoke, and be inhaled. They are highly concentrated near an infected person, so they can infect people most easily in close proximity. But aerosols containing infectious virus can also travel more than 2 m and accumulate in poorly ventilated indoor air, leading to superspreading events. [9] Cases of transmission from people more than 2 m apart have occurred but in enclosed spaces with poor ventilation, and typically with extended exposure to an infected person of more than 30 minutes.[2] In an analysis of 75,465 COVID-19 cases in China, 78-85% of clusters occurred within household settings, suggesting that transmission occurs during close and prolonged contact.[10] Outside of the household setting, those who had close physical contact, shared meals, or were in enclosed spaces for approximately one hour or more with symptomatic cases, such as in places of worship, gyms, or the workplace, were also at increased risk of infection.[1]

In summary, the transmission of COVID-19 is most likely by close contact for prolonged periods of time, half an hour or more, with someone with symptomatic infection.  It is less clear whether asymptomatic people can infect others but it has been found that pre-symptomatic people can transmit before their symptoms develop.  It is also likely that aerosol transmission is occurring particularly in poorly ventilated indoor spaces.

COVID-19 transmission in elevators

An important experiment was conducted inside elevator cabins in a hospital during normal operation with about 10%‐20% open door time. [11]  Typically, it took 12‐18 minutes before the number of aerosol particles decreased 100‐fold during normal operation of both medium‐ and large‐sized elevator cabins. With elevator doors permanently open, this time was reduced to 2‐4 minutes (Figure 1). In all cases, the number of aerosols decreased exponentially in time.

Figure 1. Aerosol droplets in elevators. Averaged number of aerosol droplets as a function of time since production as counted in large (15‐20 m3) elevator cabins [triangles] and medium‐sized (8‐12 m3) cabins [diamonds] during normal operation [orange], with permanently open doors [green], and permanently closed [red]. In all experiments, the ventilation was on with an average ACH (Air Change per Hour) = 10 value.

COVID-19 cases in elevators

There have been few well-documented cases of COVID-19 transmission in elevators:

Case 1 – Outbreak in office call building call centre in South Korea

An outbreak occurred in March, 2020 in Building X, a 19-story building in one of the busiest urban areas of Seoul. [13] Commercial offices are located on the 1st through 11th floors, and residential apartments are located on the 13th through 19th floors. 922 employees who worked in the commercial offices, 203 residents who lived in the residential apartments, and 20 visitors were identified and investigated. The call centre is located on the 7th through 9th floors and the 11th floor; it has a total of 811 employees. Employees do not generally go between floors, and they do not have an in-house restaurant for meals.

The first case-patient, who worked in an office on the 10th floor (and reportedly never went to 11th floor), had onset of symptoms on February 22. The second case-patient, who worked at the call centre on the 11th floor, had onset of symptoms on February 25. Residents and employees in building X had frequent contact in the lobby or elevators. It was not possible to trace back the index case-patient to another cluster or an imported case. There were 97 confirmed COVID-19 case-patients in building X, indicating an attack rate of 8.5%. If the results are restricted to the 11th floor, the attack rate was as high as 43.5%.

Nearly all the case-patients were on one side of the building on the 11th floor. Despite considerable interaction between workers on different floors of building X in the elevators and lobby, spread of COVID-19 was limited almost exclusively to the 11th floor, which indicates that the duration of interaction (or contact) was likely the main facilitator for further spreading of COVID-19.

Case 2 – transmission in an apartment building in China

Transmission of Covid-19 through contact with elevator surfaces was found in China. [15]

One patient, B1.1, was the downstairs neighbour of the first patient, A0. They used the same elevator in the building but not at the same time and did not have close contact otherwise. Patient B 1.1 went on to infect family and friends, who infected more family and friends, resulting in an outbreak of 71 cases.  This case is sometimes cited under the headline, “Woman infected 71 people with Covid-19 through single elevator trip in China, report finds” such as in the Evening Standard [16] although only one case of transmission through contact with elevator surfaces was found.  This case was also quoted by a company selling air filtration systems for elevators as, “6/30/20 CDC release, contact trace report. 1 woman infects over 70 people in one 60 sec elevator ride”.  These clearly inflammatory headlines do not reflect an accurate picture of the situation.

Reducing the risk of transmission in elevators

Prolonged, close contact with infected cases is the most likely way to spread COVID-19 and time spent in elevators is short. If people follow the current guidelines about the virus, i.e., wearing effective face coverings properly, practicing hand hygiene and keeping socially distanced, the dangers of transmitting the virus in elevators is small. 

There are, however, some things that can be done to further reduce the risk of transmission. Some require some behavioural changes, while others requiring engineering or control modifications. 


There are a number of published guides intended to decrease likelihood of transmission of COVID-19 in elevators. [17] [18]  [19] [9] Their recommendations can be summarised into categories of those measures under the control of building managers or tenants and those of individual elevator etiquette.

Measures under control of building managers and tenants:

  • Leave elevator doors open for longer and when elevator is idle. This will depend on local codes and may not be possible at lobby level. HVAC balance will also need to be ocnsidered.
  • Encourage stair use particularly for inter‐floor traffic, with fixed directions up and down, one way, where possible.
  • Consider a physical operator/designated attendee engaged to enter hall calls or destination dispatch requests.
  • Organize queuing, more so in the first few days of each phase seeing relaxation of restrictions.
  • Reduce capacity for elevators, such as four for larger cabs, two for smaller ones.
  • Building tenants could adopt a shift in schedules (start early or late and leave early or late).  This requires calculations of elevator transport ability (handling capacity) [20]
  • Encourage lunch at desks over a staggered time frame (three lunch hours from 11:00‐14:00 is better than 12:00‐13:00 for everyone; 12:45 is generally busiest in office elevators)
  • Promote food service providers in/near the building offering a delivery service.
  • Use floor markings in elevator lobbies and near the entrance to escalators to reinforce social distancing. Place decals inside the elevator to identify where passengers should stand, if needed.
  • Use stanchions (for lobbies only; not inside elevators) or other ways to mark pathways to help people travel in one direction and stay 6 feet apart.
  • Consider limiting the number of people in an elevator and leaving steps empty between passengers on escalators, where possible.
  • Supply hand sanitizers where possible.
  • Post signs reminding occupants to minimize surface touching.
  • Consider adding supplemental air ventilation or local air treatment devices in frequently used elevator cars.
  • Enhance cleaning of elevators, for example, hourly, depending on usage and on any local Public Health direction.
  • Consider those with disabilities, those in wheelchairs may not be able to travel in one quadrant of an elevator; those with vision challenges may need assistance in where to stand in an elevator.

Individual behaviour in an elevator can go a long way to ameliorate the risk of contamination.  These recommendations should be posted and/or circulated to building inhabitants. Elevator etiquette for users:

  • Wear cloth face coverings.
  • Stand on the markers, where provided, facing the direction indicated.
  • Announce your floor to the person closest to the buttons.
  • Avoid speaking, when possible.
  • If you have to cough or sneeze, turn to the wall and cough into elbow with mask on.
  • Avoid touching the face after holding on to handrails or touching buttons and use any available hand sanitizers.
  • Use an object (such as a pen, tissue or sanitary wipe) or knuckle to push elevator buttons.
  • If the elevator is busy, wait for the next one.
  • When door opens at floor, middle people move to side and front person moves out to create pathways to exit.


The atmosphere in a lift manufactured in complete accordance with EN 81-1, installed in a fully air-conditioned building, with the car fan switched off, became life threatening when occupied with a full load of passengers after only 30 minutes. [21] (Note that EN 81-1 has now been replaced by EN 81-20/-50).  Building to ASME A17-1 provided more ventilation and many elevator cabins are built to other national standards. (B44 is the relevant code in Canada).  Many lifts are installed in buildings without air conditioning and located in tropical and sub-tropical regions where air temperatures exceed 46˚C and humidity exceeds 50% (Apparent Temperature 66˚C). Even a single person trapped for only a short time is a great risk. The cabin ventilation requirements in the current codes might need to be revised.

Researchers of aerosol transmission in hospital elevators recommended that elevator doors be left open for a longer period whenever possible.[9]  It was found that the ventilation inside all studied elevators in idle position automatically shut off after 1-2 minutes. The authors suggested that door opening should be prolonged by reprogramming the action control software to reduce contamination.  Another suggestion was to reverse the flow direction of the ventilator, creating a unidirectional downflow of fresh (eg, HEPA filtered) air from the ceiling towards the floor of the elevator cabin.

Air circulation fans have been suggested as possibly being helpful.  KJA have looked at this possibility and note that currently most fans do not have filters and it is KJA experience that many of them are not functioning. Additional air circulation might disperse aerosols but this is unlikely to reduce transmission if air is recirculated without filtration or treatment. A study of influenza infection risk in cars with low medium and high ventilation of circulating air suggested that infection risk can be reduced by not recirculating air. Estimated risk ranged from 59% to 99.9% for a 90-minutes trip when air was recirculated. [22] It has not been demonstrated that merely circulating the air will reduce transmission, compared with introducing more fresh air and removing stale air more frequently.

Fans with filters are an improvement over air recirculating fans. They would, however, require additional maintenance (replacing filters for example); will increase the weight which might trigger rebalancing and other work; and adding cab top components can make it less safe for the mechanic to work on top of the car. The best practice would probably be to have HEPA filtered downflow fresh air constantly during operation and doors open fans on for at least 4 minutes where possible, but note the comments about maintenance.

UV and air ionizing treatments are being offered commercially but would suffer from the same problems highlighted under air circulation fans, discussed above.  There also seems to be little direct evidence that this would substantially reduce transmission in elevators. 


KJA has recently reviewed how surfaces of different materials become contaminated. [23]

Microbes can live for varying lengths of time, from up to 5 days on glass to several hours on cardboard and pure copper. Copper-containing materials are known to deactivate microorganisms and this type of material is being offered for cab interiors.  Copper-containing surfaces will reduce the lifetime of droplets landing on them after several hours or days but copper materials are unlikely to be a viable solution because elevator surfaces may be touched every few seconds or minutes. [24]

It is known that sweat can corrode copper alloys (metal mixtures) like brass in the long term. Researchers found recently that within as little as an hour, the salt in sweat can form a corrosive layer on the surface of the metal, which would prevent the electrochemical reaction that kills microorganisms. [25]  Some cleaning solutions may also coat the copper surface and inhibit its biocidal activity.[20]

Touchless controls

There are many commercial products that can convert elevators into non-touch operation to reduce the small risk of transmission by contact. These include glass-fronted touchscreens that are sealed just like a smartphone, so they can withstand disinfection; and touchless call buttons that will summon an elevator with a wave of the hand, or direct it with just a hovering finger. [26]  Technology has been developed in China that uses a hologram to project virtual buttons into the air.

One technology found in high-end office towers is called “destination dispatch” in which riders enter their floor on a touchscreen and are directed to a specific elevator with others going to the same floor or those in the same vicinity. No more stopping at every floor. Advanced destination dispatch systems are tied into turnstiles where employees swipe their cards for entry to office towers. The system automatically summons an elevator and directs the user to which one to take.  Other systems use an app tied into proximity sensors but connectivity remains a challenge.

Large floor-mounted buttons at floor level in halls and elevators can be hit with a shoe avoid the need to touch buttons with a finger.

* An updated article with newer finding, especially in relation to the Omicron variant, can be found here: https://www.kja.com/2022/01/05/update-to-elevators-and-covid-transmission-a-scientific-review/
This existing post remains available for reference, but updated guidance is provided in the latest posting.

References and sources:

[1] Anon, ‘Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions”, Scientific brief, WHO/2019-nCoV/Sci_Brief/Transmission_modes/2020.3, 9th July, (2020) 10 pp.
[2] Lancet Editorial. COVID-19 transmission—up in the air Published Online October 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S2213-2600(20)30514-2
[3] Mondelli et al. Low risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by fomites in real-life conditions. Lancet Infect Dis 2020 Published Online September 29, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30678-2.
[4] E Goldman, 2020 Exaggerated risk of transmission of COVID-19 by fomites. The Lancet. Published Online July 3, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1473-3099(20)30561-2.
[5] Prather, et al. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Published online https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6514/303.2/tab-pdf.
[6] G Aernout Somsen, et al. Small droplet aerosols in poorly ventilated spaces and SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The Lancet. Published Online May 27, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30245-9
[9] S. L. Miller et al., Indoor Air, 10.1111/ina.12751 (2020) in ref. 5.
[10] Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 16-24 February 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf.
[11] C. van Rijn et al. Reducing aerosol transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 in hospital elevators. Indoor air. Vol 30(6).
[13] Park, et al 2020 Coronavirus Disease Outbreak in Call Center, South Korea. Emerging Infectious Diseases • www.cdc.gov/eid • Vol. 26, No. 8, August 2020
[14] J.T. Liu. 2020. Large SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak Caused by Asymptomatic Traveler, China. Emerging Infectious Diseases • www.cdc.gov/eid • Vol. 26, No. 9, September 2020: 2260-2263.
[16] H Brewis. Woman infected 71 people with Covid-19 through single elevator trip in China, report finds, Evening Standard News 13 July, 2020.
[17] Anon, “COVID‐19 PANDEMIC 2020, Post Pandemic Action Plan ‐ VT Considerations”, KJA Consultants Inc., https://www.kja.com/2020/05/06/kja-covid19-post-pandemic-considerations/
[18] BOMA Canada Coronavirus Working Group, “Pathway Back to Work” BOMA Canada, version 2, June 18th (2020) p. 9-10.
[19] Anon, “COVID-19 Employer Information for Office Buildings”, CDC, January (2021)
[20] KJA How to manage Elevator Service in buildings under Social Distancing Restrictions. https://www.kja.com/2020/05/05/how-to-manage-elevator-service-in-buildings-under-social-distancing-restrictions/
[21] Rory S. Smith, “Cabin Ventilation, Code Requirements and Experimental Results”, 3rd Symposium on Lift & Escalator Technology (CIBSE Lifts Group, The University of Northampton and LEIA) (2013). Web version © Peters Research Ltd 2019.
[22] Knibbs L.D., Morawska L., Bell S.C. The risk of airborne influenza transmission in passenger cars. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012;140:474–478.
[23] PJB Scott and M Davies, 2020 Contamination of surfaces in elevators and on escalators. https://www.kja.com/2020/05/05/contamination-of-surfaces-in-elevators-and-escalators/
[24] M. Davies, PJB Scott, “Elevator Buttons – Antimicrobial properties of copper and copper alloys”, December (2020) https://www.kja.com/2020/12/21/antimicrobial-properties-of-copper-and-copper-alloys/
[25] Bob Hirshon, “Antibacterial door knobs”, AAA Science Net Links, Antibacterial Doorknobs – Science Updates – Science NetLinks
[26] Meredith MacLeod, “New Normal: Elevators moving touchless, mobile and sideways”, CTV News, July 31st (2020)